print copyright January 9, 1996  Kara Chiodo
HTML copyright August 9, 1998 Kara Chiodo
Copies may be made for educational use only.
Contact the author at goldbug@ou.edu

General Criticism

The following works are general criticism on Orwell and his works as a whole. While Orwell's critical reception has generally been one of admiration, there is still much dissension among critics. Again, I have included works from a wide range of critical viewpoints.

 Alldritt, Keith. The Making of George Orwell. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1961.
* Traces Orwell's literary development from his rebellion against the symbolist tradition to the creation of the "George Orwell" persona with which to express his response to "social life." GO

 Calder, Jenni. Chronicles of Conscience: A Study of George Orwell and Arthur Koestler. London: Secker & Warburg, 1968.
* A comparative study of the whole body of work of both men, examining the as prophets and revolutionaries; this is the first study to see Orwell in a wider European perspective. PPF
* Calder concludes that their work will be relevant as long as authoritarian governments continue to exist. AB

 Carter, Michael. George Orwell and the Problem of Authentic Existence. London and Sydney: Croom Helm, 1985.
* Presents Orwell's novels as varying attempts to reconcile the individual with society by means of a search for "authentic self." GO

 Gross, Miriam, ed. The World of George Orwell. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1971.
* Excellently illustrated compendium of essays on various aspects of Orwell's life and work. Particularly stimulating is D. A. N. Jones's "Arguments Against Orwell," the devil's advocate's case. GO
* ...the best essays are by William Empson and Malcolm Muggeridge. PPF
* Half the essays are autobiographical, half critical... AB

 Hammond, J. R. A George Orwell Companion. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1982.
* Sensible, rather than profound, multipurpose book: accounts of Orwell's life and achievement, individual studies, key to "characters and locations," short descriptive bibliography. GO
* An excellent introduction that combines brief reference material...with longer analyses of Orwell's books. TK

 Hollis, Christopher. A Study of George Orwell. London: Hollis and Carter, 1956.
* This is a perceptive and stimulating study of Orwell's life and works written from a Roman Catholic standpoint. The author was a contemporary of Orwell's at Eton and is therefore able to write of his school days with an intimate knowledge....has much to offer as a comprehensive portrait of Orwell as man and writer. GOC

 Hunter, Lynette. George Orwell: The Search for a Voice. Stony Stratford, England: Open University Press, 1984.
* Examines Orwell's narrative voice in his major works. PPF

 Lee, Robert. Orwell's Fiction. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.
* First study devoted to Orwell as a novelist, and particularly to his management of symbols. GO
* Shifts the emphasis away from fictionalized autobiography and social criticism to the books as fiction. Finds the major theme to be the failure and corruption of language. PPF

 Lief, Ruth Ann. Homage to Oceania: The Prophetic Vision of George Orwell. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press, 1969.
*Study of Orwell's political beliefs as evinced in his work, upholding his humanism and belief in the ordinary man. PPF

 Meyers, Jeffrey. A Reader's Guide to George Orwell. London: Thames and Hudson, 1975.
* This is an excellently written and produced guide to Orwell's works, tracing in chronological order the developments in his work and thought. The author's approach is thorough and scholarly....Strongly recommended. GOC

 Meyers, Jeffrey, ed. George Orwell: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1975.
* The 108 reviews in this book trace Orwell's critical and personal reputation from Down and Out in Paris and London (1933) to the Collected Essays, Journalism, and Letters (1968) and include translations from Russian, Polish, German, and French. The long Introduction discusses the controversy provoked by Orwell's books, the four phases of his career and reputation, and the dominant themes of the criticism. AB

 Modern Fiction Studies. Spring 1975: 1-136.
* A special issue on Orwell which includes essays by Martin Green on Eton, Melvyn New on anti-Semitism, Richard Voorhees on recent criticism, and Jeffrey Meyers, James Connors and others on the major novels. It also contains a checklist of criticism. AB

 Norris, Christopher, ed. Inside the Whale: Orwell: Views from the Left. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1984.
* Generally hostile or "de-mythologizing" essays, concerned to highlight the "right-wing recuperative reading" of Orwell's work and the elements in it that make such a reading possible. GO

 Oxley, B. T. George Orwell. London: Evans Brothers, 1967.
* This introductory study, which contains some interesting photos, places Orwell's life in the context of the period, and focusses on Orwell as journalist who responded to political events. Counting only Animal Farm a literary success, Oxley places Orwell in the English documentary tradition. He links Orwell's five novels through the protagonists, who are all victims. AB

 Patai, Daphne. The Orwell Mystique: A Study in Male Ideology. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1984.
*Feminist study of Orwell, taking issue with his limited view of women, and the cult of maleness that underlies his work. Written with clarity and vigor, often yielding useful insights. GO

 Rees, Richard. George Orwell: Fugitive From the Camp of Victory. London: Secker & Warburg, 1961.
* An introductory study by one of Orwell's closest friends, who first published Orwell's work in the Adelphi in 1930. Rees blends biography and criticism throughout, as many critics tend to do. He separates Orwell's character into four main aspects: the rebel, a serious and tragic pessimist; the traditionalist, sympathetic to benign authority; the eighteenth-century rationalist and master of the plain style; the romantic, lover of the past. Rees ascribes his distinction as a writer to his sense of guilt and keenly realistic conscience. AB

 Small, Christopher. The Road to Miniluv: George Orwell, the State, and God. London: V. Gollancz, 1975.
* Uncovers the underlying religious problem in Orwell's book, arguing that Orwell's anguish comes from recognizing that "if God is a myth, socialised humanity is just as much so." PPF

 Thomas, Edward. Orwell. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1965.
* Sees Orwell's work as full of contradictions, since each book shows him adopting a different persona and relationship to experience. GO
* Introductory survey suggesting that the Orwell we meet in the works may be a consciously contrived literary persona. Orwell's chief theme is a betrayal of the clerks and a capitulation to power. PPF

 Voorhees, Richard. The Paradox of George Orwell. West Lafayette, Ind.: Purdue University Studies, 1961.
* The first scholarly study not by an acquaintance, analyzing Orwell's paradoxical attitudes to rebellion, power, and socialism. PPF
* ...still one of the best scholarly studies on Orwell, despite being written before the publication of the Collected Essays, Journalism, and Letters. PREF

 West, Anthony. "George Orwell." Principles and Persuasions. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1958. 150-159.
* West's essay is one of the most original and stimulating interpretations of Orwell. He sees the seeds of 1984 in Keep the Aspidistra Flying -- Orwell's mind is already warming to the idea of a universal smash-up -- and relates the later novel to Orwell's autobiographical essay on his sadistic prep school. West believes that the terrors of 1984 are of an infantile character, and they clearly derive from the experience described in "Such, Such Were the Joys." What Orwell did in 1984 was to send everybody in England to an enormous Crossgates to be as miserable as he had been. West concludes his interpretation by suggesting that only the existence of a hidden wound can account for such a remorseless pessimism. AB

 Williams, Raymond. George Orwell. London: Fontana/Collins, 1971.
* This is an admirably succinct introduction to Orwell and his works which concentrates on the ideas and political beliefs underlying his writings....Though some readers may find Williams's polemical approach too abrasive, this study is essential to a full understanding of Orwell as an ideological writer. GOC
* ...hints, rather than states, a dissatisfaction with Orwell's equivocal socialism: he is part of a historical period, rather than a guide for the future. GO

 Williams, Raymond, ed. George Orwell : A Collection of Critical Essays. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1974.
* A selection of essays which aims to represent three generations of Criticism on Orwell: the early response to political controversy, the contemporary critics who felt close to Orwell's example and approve of his attitudes, and the younger generation who have gone back to interpret his work. Williams reprints essays by himself, Terry Eagleton, Richard Hoggart, Lionel Trilling, E. P. Thompson, John Wain, Stephen Greenblatt, Isaac Deutscher, Jenni Calder, Conor Cruise O'Brien, and George Woodcock. AB

 Woodcock, George. The Crystal Spirit: A Study of George Orwell. Boston: Little, Brown, 1966.
* ...now acknowledged to be the definitive critical work on Orwell....examines his contribution as a man, a novelist, a patriot, and a stylist. The book is especially valuable as a study of the diverse, even contradictory elements which together made up Orwell's personality....The sections which summarise the novels, non- fiction, and essays are notable for their clarity and acute understanding, whilst the entire work is suffused with sympathetic insight....indispensable as an appraisal of Orwell's strengths and weaknesses and his unique place in twentieth-century literature. GOC

 World Review. June 1950: 3-60.
* This special issue on Orwell, published shortly after his death, contains selections from his unpublished Notebooks, biographical sketches by Bertrand Russell and T. R. Fyvel, and essays on his major works by Malcolm Muggeridge, John Beavan, Stephen Spender, Tom Hopkinson, Herbert Read and Aldous Huxley. AB

 Zwerdling, Alex. Orwell and the Left. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.
* Though the title genuinely indicates the author's analysis of Orwell's left-wing ideas, this study is equally concerned with Orwell's fictional art, about which it is exceptionally perceptive, seeing Orwell's shortcomings but recognizing their relationship to his concerns as a polemist. GO
* An excellent defense of the position that Orwell was "an internal critic of socialism," not a defector from it. Presents Orwell as a diagnostician of the Left's ills. PPF

 

Criticism on Nineteen Eighty-Four

The works in this section focus on Nineteen Eighty-Four, Orwell's most famous work. It is the only one of Orwell's works to have a large body of criticism pertaining specifically to it. Approaches to criticism of Nineteen Eighty-Four vary greatly; I have included many different ones.

 Allen, Francis A. "Nineteen Eighty-Four and the Eclipse of the Private World." Michigan Quarterly Review. 12 (1983).
* Argues that the individual's loss of privacy is the most frightening aspect of Orwell's dystopia. PPF

 Barnsley, John H. "The Last Man in Europe: A Comment on George Orwell's 1984." Contemporary Review. 239 (1981).
* Quarrels with Orwell's pessimistic view of the proles and with his view of technology as a means of repression. PPF

 Barr, Alan. "The Paradise Behind 1984." English Miscellany. 19 (1968): 197-203.
* An attempt to show that in 1984 Orwell shows man ironically seeking the opposite of the Judeo-Christian dream of paradise. Barr indicates some religious parallels and allusions in the novel. AB

 Beauchamp, Gorman. "Of Man's Last Disobedience: Zamyatin's We and Orwell's 1984." Comparative Literature Studies. 10 (1973): 285-301.
* Identifies Adam in the religious myth as the ancestor of Orwell's rebel. PPF
* In We and 1984 the conflict of the individual's rebellion against the State reenacts the Christian myth of Adam's disobedience against God by defying the godlike State and asserting man's instinctual freedom. AB

 Bolton, W. F. The Language of "1984": Orwell's Language and Our Own. Oxford and London: Basil Blackwell and Andre Deutsch, 1984.
* Technical study, detailed but very readable, of Orwell's attitudes to, and use of, English, relating these to how the English language has actually developed since his death. GO

 Burgess, Anthony. 1985. London: Hutchinson, 1978.
* In this detailed and brilliantly written critique of Nineteen Eighty-Four the author challenges many of the intellectual assumptions on which the novel is based. He demonstrates that the type of society postulated by Orwell is inherently improbable and concludes that "As a projection of a possible future, Orwell's vision has a purely fragmentary validity." This is a stimulating and thought-provoking essay which should be widely read. GOC

 Calder, Jenni. Huxley and Orwell: "Brave New World" and "1984." London: Edward Arnold, 1976.
* A comparative approach to the two outstanding dystopian novels of our century. PPF

 College Literature. 11.1 (1984).
* Issue devoted to studies of Nineteen Eighty-Four. PPF

 Dooley, D. J. "The Freudian Critics of 1984." Triumph. 1 (1974): 34-39.
* Rejects the Freudian interpretation by insisting that Orwell's fears are based on observed realities, not neurotic fantasies. PPF

 Elsbree, Langdon. "The Structured Nightmare of 1984." Twentieth Century Literature. 5 (1959): 135-41.
* A reading of 1984 as structured by dreams and reveries to create a world in which there is no fixed reality. Elsbree analyzes each of the three parts to show their consistent structure and describes two sets of images: physical confinement and open spaces; darkness and blinding artificial light. AB

 Feder, Lillian. "Selfhood, Language and Reality: George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty- Four." Georgia Review. 37 (1983).
* Identifies the gravest threat of Oceania as the separation of language from any real function. PPF

 Fink, Howard. "Newspeak: The Epitome of Parody Techniques in 1984." Critical Survey. 5 (1971): 155-63.
* Newspeak is an ironic parody of three sources: C. K. Ogden's Basic English, Lancelot Hogben's Interglossa and F. A. von Hayek's The Road to Serfdom. Fink traces Orwell's early interest in and approval of Basic English, and his rejection of it in "Politics and the English Language." He illustrates in some detail how Ogden and Hogben's goal of reduction of vocabulary is parodied in Newspeak A, and how von Hayek's chapter on Fascist propaganda techniques inspired Newspeak B. AB

 Foley, Joseph and James Ayer. "Orwell in English and Newspeak: A Computer Translation." College Composition and Communication. 17 (1966): 15-18.
* A computer translation of part of Orwell's "Why I Write" into Newspeak reveals the corruption of meaning that characterized the official prose style of Oceania. AB

 Geering, R. G. "Darkness at Noon and 1984 -- A Comparative Study." Australian Quarterly. 30 (1958): 90-96.
* Geering traces parallels between Orwell and Koestler's experience of politics and their disillusionment with the possibilities of Communist revolution. He shows how 1984 intensifies some of the ideas and develops the characters of Darkness at Noon. Orwell differs from Koestler in believing that revolution will occur in spite of corruption, though he agrees with Koestler that all revolution is doomed to fail because of man's lust for power. AB

 Hamilton, Kenneth M. "G.K. Chesterton and George Orwell: A Contrast in Prophecy." Dalhousie Review. 31 (1951): 198-205.
* Finds Nineteen Eighty-Four superior to The Napoleon of Notting Hill because of its greater realism. PPF

 Hollis, Christopher. "1984 and the Necessity of Doublethink." Horizon. 20 (1949): 200-208.
* Hollis approaches 1984 through a criticism of the Marxist principle that economic interest motivates man, and asserts that love of power is a stronger force. He illustrates this idea from 1984, explains how Doublethink is found in parliamentary government, and criticizes as implausible Orwell's notion of controlled warfare. AB

 Howe, Irving, ed. "1984" Revisited: Totalitarianism in Our Century. New York: Harper and Row, 1982.
* Argues that the book should be read as a mixture of genres: Menippean satire, conventional novel, tract, romance. PPF

 Hynes, Samuel. Twentieth Century Interpretations of "1984." Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1971.
* A valuable collection of critical essays and reviews. Hynes finds in Orwell a tension between the need for political action and the desire for a private life. PPF
* The book contains essays by: V. S. Pritchett, Lionel Trilling, Isaac Deutscher, Irving Howe, John Strachey, Stephen Spender, George Kateb, Alex Zwerdling; brief extracts by Wyndham Lewis, A. L. Morton, and Herbert Read; and a letter to Orwell by Aldous Huxley. AB

 Jensen, Ejner J., ed. The Future of "Nineteen Eighty-Four." Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1984.
* Contains new essays on Nineteen Eighty-Four, including one by Senator Eugene McCarthy, and a penetrating study, "Orwell's Psychopolitics" by Alex Zwerdling. GO

 Maddison, Michael. "1984: A Burnhamite Fantasy?" Political Quarterly. 32 (1961): 71-79.
* Interprets the book as a depiction of James Burnham's managerial revolution and the growth of power elites. PPF

 McDowell, Jennifer. "1984 and Soviet Reality." University of California Graduate Journal. 1 (1962): 12-19.
* A useful essay which relates 1984 to published statements about the USSR available to Orwell, and shows the extent to which the novel was based on Soviet life. McDowell cites factual parallels in the Soviet Union's social structure, police methods and legal system, its repression of artists, its attitude to love and marriage, its use of propaganda to enforce conformity, and its falsification of history and statistics. AB

 McNamara, James and Dennis J. O'Keefe. "Waiting for 1984: On Orwell and Evil." Encounter. 59 (1982).
* Regards the book as a moral treatise about the state of the world after the destruction of capitalism. PPF

 Meyers, Jeffrey. "The Evolution of 1984." English Miscellany. 23 (1972): 247-61.
* 1984 is a concrete and naturalistic portrayal of the present and the past, and its great originality results more from a realistic synthesis and rearrangement of familiar materials than from any prophetic or imaginary speculations. The novel is not only a paradigm of the history of Europe for the previous twenty years, but also a culmination of all the characteristic beliefs and ideas expressed in Orwell's works from the Depression to the Cold War. AB

 Patai, Daphne. "Gamesmanship and Androcentrism in Orwell's 1984." Publications of the Modern Language Association. 97 (1982).
* Examines the Party's pursuit of power for its own sake in terms of games theory. PPF

 Philmus, Robert. "The Language of Utopia." Studies in the Literary Imagination. 6 (1973): 61-78.
* Houyhnmhnmland and Oceania provide contexts for testing the limiting conditions of language as a function of political order. Both are hypothetical models of societies in which language approaches the extreme of total assent, where language can do no more than reflect, and thus guarantee, the nature of the social order. AB

 Ranald, Ralph. "George Orwell and the Mad World: The Anti-Universe of 1984." South Atlantic Quarterly. 64 (1967): 544-53.
* 1984 is about a world where normal values are reversed and communication takes place only through inflicting pain. Winston and O'Brien's dialogue is an inverted Platonic dialogue and Winston's defeat is the reverse of Socrates'. In emphasizing the failure of communication Orwell has much in common with modern dramatists. AB

 Reilly, Patrick. "Nineteen Eighty-Four: The Failure of Humanism." Critical Quarterly. 24 (1982).
* Argues that the book discredits humanism as a valid creed for modern times. PPF

 Reilly, Patrick. "Nineteen Eighty-Four: The Insufficient Self." The Literature of Guilt: From "Gulliver" to Golding. London: Macmillan; Ames: University of Iowa Press, 1988.
* Shows the relationship of Nineteen Eighty-Four to Gulliver's Travels, especially in a shared awareness of failure and corruption. PPF

 Smith, Marcus. "The Wall of Blackness: A Psychological Approach to 1984." Modern Fiction Studies. 14 (1968-69): 423-33.
* An explication of Winston Smith's psychology. The author argues that Winston's rebellion is unconscious and instinctive, and that his neurosis about his mother becomes transferred to Big Brother. Thus the novel suggests that human nature is rooted in the unconscious and is not changed or controlled by the Party. AB

 Sperber, Murray. "Gazing into the Glass Paperweight: The Structure and Psychology of Orwell's 1984." Modern Fiction Studies. 26 (1980).
* Compares the book with Freud's studies of paranoia, focusing on Orwell's overriding interest in exploring the world of human persecution. PPF

 Stansky, Peter, ed. On "Nineteen Eighty-Four." New York and San Francisco: W, H Freeman and Co., 1983.
* Essays on Orwell and Nineteen Eighty-Four, by scholars at Stanford University, from a wide range of literary, political, and sociological perspectives. GO

 Steinhoff, William. George Orwell and the Origins of "1984." Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1975.
* A valuable examination of Orwell's literary influences and attitude toward intellectuals, and analysis of the early novels from the perspective of 1984. A study of the personal experiences and intellectual context of Orwell's last novel shows that his development as a writer coincided with his growing knowledge and hatred of totalitarianism; and that 1984 is a culminating work which expresses, almost epitomizes, a lifetime's ideas, attitudes, events and reading. AB

 Voorhees, Richard. "1984: No Failure of Nerve." College English. 18 (1956): 101-102.
* Voorhees points out the similarities between the world of 1984 and Coming Up for Air. Orwell's explicit reference to the early decades of the twentieth century in the Appendix on "Newspeak" indicate that 1984 is not a prophecy of doom, but an exaggeration of themes Orwell had treated earlier in the novels and essays. AB

 Wicker, Brian. "An Analysis of Newspeak." Blackfriars. 43 (1962): 272-85.
* Wicker argues, with examples from 1984, that Orwell was the victim of a deep philosophical dissociation between the observer and the world, language and thought, words and objects. ¤

OU Home | Disclaimer | Copyright | Equal Opportunity | OU Web Policy