
al-Khwarizmi introduces the main topic of this first section of his book. His equations are linear or quadratic and are composed of units, roots and squares. For example, to al-Khwarizmi a unit was a number, a root was x, and a square was x2. However, although we shall use the now familiar algebraic notation in this article to help the reader understand the notions, Al-Khwarizmi's mathematics is done entirely in words with no symbols being used.
He first reduces an equation (linear or quadratic) to one of six standard forms:
1. Squares equal to roots.
2. Squares equal to numbers.
3. Roots equal to numbers.
4. Squares and roots equal to numbers; e.g. x2 + 10 x = 39.
5. Squares and numbers equal to roots; e.g. x2 + 21 = 10 x.
6. Roots and numbers equal to squares; e.g. 3 x + 4 = x2.
The
reduction is carried out using the two operations of al-jabr
and al-muqabala. For example, using one of
al-Khwarizmi's own examples, "al-jabr" transforms
x2 = 40 x - 4 x2
into 5 x2 = 40 x.
The term "al-muqabala" means "balancing" and is the process of reducing
positive terms of the same power when they occur on both sides of an
equation. For example, two applications of "al-muqabala" reduces 50 + 3
x + x2 = 29 + 10 x to 21 + x2
= 7 x
Al-Khwarizmi
then shows how to solve the six standard types of
equations. He uses both algebraic methods of solution and geometric
methods. For example to solve the equation x2 + 10 x
= 39 he writes
... a square and 10 roots are equal to 39 units. The question therefore in this type of equation is about as follows: what is the square which combined with ten of its roots will give a sum total of 39? The manner of solving this type of equation is to take one-half of the roots just mentioned. Now the roots in the problem before us are 10. Therefore take 5, which multiplied by itself gives 25, an amount which you add to 39 giving 64. Having taken then the square root of this which is 8, subtract from it half the roots, 5 leaving 3. The number three therefore represents one root of this square, which itself, of course is 9. Nine therefore gives the square.
The
geometric proof by completing the square follows. Al-Khwarizmi starts
with a square of side x, which therefore represents x2.
To the square we must add 10x and this is done by adding four
rectangles each of breadth 10/4 and length x to the square
(Figure 2). Figure 2 has area x2 + 10 x
which is equal to 39. We now complete the square by adding the four
little squares each of area 5/2
5/2
= 25/4. Hence the outside square in Fig 3 has area 4
25/4 + 39 = 25 + 39 = 64. The side of the
square is therefore 8. But the side is of length 5/2 + x + 5/2
so x + 5 = 8, giving x = 3.
Al Khwarizmi, aside from creating the mathematical equation for
completing the square, Khwaizmi also developed a mathematical way
to mulitply the expression (a + b x) (c
+ d x)
We
study his works in Algebra and we refer to them as quadratic and linear
equations. We also do not give credit for Al- Khwarizmi for his use of
the place holder 0. Prior to Al-Khwarizmi the was in the place of
the 10 algorithmically, Khwarizmi saw the need for a number 0
particularly with roots, so instead Khwarizmi place the zero in front
of the 1.
We now
know that Al-Khwarizmi is a brilliant mathematician, but did you also
know he was considered a great contributor to the world of Geography?
It's true, Khwarizmi built on the work of Ptolomy in Khwarizmis' book.
Khwarizmi constructed maps based on latitudes and longitudes.
On top
of all that Al- Khwarizmi was also an astrologer, no, not astronomer.
He actually wrote horoscopes for prominent political figures. He also
wrote many books on the sundial, astrolabe, and different calendars.
Web Citations:
O'Conner, JJ, Robertson, EF
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Al-Khwarizmi.html
*picture and diagram also courtsey of the web page
Conger, Heather, Overbay, Shawn, Schorer, Jimmy. Al-Khwarizmi
http://www.ms.uky.edu/~carl/ma330/project2/al-khwa21.html
Turner, Howard, Science
in Medieval Islam. University of Texas Press 1995
**Authors Notes
I afirm the credibility of my websources due to the
scholarly nature of the articles. The mathematical equations and
explainations are taken directly from the O'Conner and Robertson
website.