Episode 3: In Memoriam

By Kevin Lai

Rome, Italy

“I will pass over the other arts in silence and direct my words for a while to that which is responsible for the health of mankind; certainly of all the arts that human genius has discovered, this is by far the most useful, indispensible, difficult, and laborious.” – Andreas Vesalius, De Humani Corporus Fabrica

The world mourns the loss of a brilliant scholar after reports of his disappearance have been confirmed. Andreas Vesalius, anatomist and scientist, died of unknown causes several weeks ago. He was returning from his exile to the Holy Land when storms beset his return. His ship was stranded in the sea for forty days, when he became ill and died soon after making landfall. He leaves behind his wife and daughter (1).

Vesalius was born into a medical family that provided a strong background for his development. He studied at the Castle School of the University of Louvain, studying rhetoric, philosophy, and logic. By 1533 he began to think about medicine, and went to Paris to study at the leading medical school north of the Alps. It was there that Vesalius learned anatomy, taught from the works of Bolognese professor Mondino de’ Liuzzi. Vesalius participated in public dissections and was often involved in discrete “grave searches” for various skeletons for examination (1). During this time Vesalius studied under the great men, Jacob Sylvius and Guinterius (2).

Vesalius then moved back to Louvain for a short time where he published his first book, a commentary on the “Almansor” of Rhazes. From there he traveled to Italy, where he attended the practice of a hospital in Venice. Vesalius made observations on the China-root during his tenure at this hospital, and published a monograph of this subject in 1546. Around this time he also visited the school in Padua. By the time he was 24 years old, Vesalius was the chair of surgery and anatomy at Padua’s medical school. In this capacity he was able to begin the task of attempting to accurately describe every part of the human anatomy, complete with illustrations. Within four short years he was finished with De Humani Corporis Fabrica, translated On the Fabric of the Human Body. Vesalius took everything Galen studied and expanded it. The illustrations and descriptions were far greater in detail than anything else before it. Thanks to the advent of the printing press, this work was now easily reproducible and readily preserved (2).

This direct assault on the integrity of Galen’s work in anatomy proved to be outrageous to the scientific community. Some of Vesalius’ contemporaries remember those days quite clearly. “There is no way that one man could determine a more comprehensive treatment of human anatomy than Galen. Even those of us who saw Andreas’ public dissections and were regular attendees to his lectures did not believe that he was capable of putting together something so massive on his own,” one of Vesalius’ friends commented. Discouraged by the public outcry against his work, Vesalius burned his manuscripts. For a few years, he disappeared from public sight until he took service with Charles V in 1546 (2).

Once again in the public eye, he was revered and hailed as one of the greatest physicians in the whole of Europe. He was one of the first to recognize internal aneurysms, and was a distinguished surgeon and active practitioner in the greatest court of Europe. In 1555 he unveiled his second edition of the Corporis Fabrica, which included even more information than the first edition (2).

Despite his sudden disgrace and subsequent pilgrimage to the Holy Land, Vesalius left the medical profession with volumes of information in anatomy that will most undoubtedly remain for centuries to come, as Galen’s work did before him. While Vesalius’ commentaries on physiology are less noteworthy, his profound studies in anatomy have set the pace of medical practice. It is with great sorrow that we must mourn this great man’s passing today.

Author's Note

My secondary source is reliable because it is the text of a reputable scholar’s account. This text is published on an educational website, which adds to the reliability of the work.

I used the sources as a background for the interpretation. Most of the primary source was used only as a reference, because this account is largely biographical. All of the quotes by Vesalius’ contemporaries are ficticious and helped describe the reported sentiments of scientists at that time.

Citations

Primary source

(1) Andreas Vesalius, Daniel Garrison, and Malcolm Hast, “De Humani Corporis Fabrica”, http://vesalius.northwestern.edu/index.html. This webpage provides a translation and annotation of Andreas Vesalius’ work. I believe this source would be useful because of its demonstration of knowledge about the human anatomy in the 16th century.

Secondary source

(2) Sir William Osler, “The Evolution Of Modern Medicine”, http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/toc/modeng/public/OslEvol.html. This website contains the full text of Sir William Osler’s work. I believe that this work would serve as a great resource for looking at all of the different time periods, as well as provide some information about specific civilizations. I believe this is a reliable source because it is found on an institutional website, and because the content of the site is Sir William Osler’s work.

Image Credit

Andreas Vesalius
Woodcut opposite p.1 of the Fabrica, 1543.
Weblink: http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=OslEvol.sgm&images=images/modeng&data=/texts/english/modeng/parsed&tag=public&part=all

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com