Reaction
Paper IV
ÝÝÝÝ I disagree with him.Ý Media provide different modes of delivery.
Therefore, the differences in the mode of delivery should result in different
outcomes. To use Clarkís analogy, we are not talking about one medication
(letís use aspirin).Ý We are talking
about the difference between aspirin, advil, Tylenol, and motrin.Ý Which works better to relieve a headache, or
a toothache, or a bruised knee?Ý Aspirin
might upset someoneís stomach whereas another person may be allergic to the
ingredients in advil. I believe that variety promotes preference.Ý I also disagree that different media
attributes accomplish basically the same thing.Ý Individuals havedifferent learning styles. This should be taken
into account when considering appropriate media.Ý I agree with Kozma.Ý He
suggests that different media have unique attributes that contribute towards
enhancing the cognitive processes involved in learning.Ý Therefore, a student may have difficulty
visualizing something presented in a textbook or on television.Ý However, that same student may be able to
grasp a concept presented in an interactive way in a computer simulation.Ý This reminds me of the article we reviewed
last week, which discussed how businesses and corporations are using the
computer to problem solve. They are able to change one variable and observe the
changes that occur throughout the system. This enables them to project what
changes they want to make and how it will affect present and future operations.
They gain an understanding of the interactive nature of the systems they are
dealing with because they can see what the expected outcomes would be if they
made the decisions.The author made a point of saying that what took months of
planning and developing can be done in a matter of days with computers. This is
another consideration in favor of Kozmaís argument.
ÝÝÝÝ One of the examples Kozma used related to
students in a physics class learning about force and motion. He suggested that
the students had a better grasp of how force behaves by watching its affects
and trajectory movement of objects as part of an interactive computer
simulation
program.
Learning by understanding the consequences of their actions helped students
mentally process the laws of force and motion at a deeper level than they would
have been able to otherwise. Clark may argue that the students would have
learned the concepts anyway.Ý One question
would be how long would it have taken them to do that?Ý I do not argue that computers are the answer
for every kind of learning situation. However, in some situations, the benefits
of computer programs may outweigh other media choices that exist.
ÝÝÝÝ I also noted that Clarkís reply still
relied on very old information. He reiterated his old statements with the same
old information.Ý It was as if the
advent of computer technology and computer programs had done little if anything
to change his mind in regard to the potential benefits of this new media (with
its software and programs) over other media. Kozmaís information was more
current to the time in which he was writing. His article also suggested trends
for the future growth and potential for different media in instructional
design.